
The 2010-11 opening night is less than 48 hours away and we have no idea who will be our starting goaltender ahhhhh!!!!
Now this could be a good thing, you could have 2 amazing netminders to choose from, and are just trying to pick who's more awesome. In Ottawa, we do not have that problem. What we do have however, is the same problem we've had in pretty much every single one of our soon to be 18 seasons. That problem is well known and has yet to be solved still.
We thought we had a solution in 05-06, when we had signed future HOFer Dominik Hasek after pushing Patrick Lalime out of town. To be fair, Hasek was 28-10 with 5 shutouts, a 2.09 GAA and .925 save % before he was hurt at the Olympics. It was the only real time I've ever felt what it's like to have an elite goalie, to not have to worry about a weak untimely goal killing us. This was a glorious feeling. It made me envious of teams that have had a rock for years in net. They have no clue how lucky they are, I bet they take them for granted in places like New Jersey, Vancouver or even Calgary.
So now there is a decision to be made by Friday night and unfortunately for Cory Clouston, either goalie chosen will be because someone has to play, not because either really deserve to or have earned it.
The 2 choices of course, are Brian Elliott and Pascal Leclaire. Neither of them are stellar. The Senators had hoped one of them would have stepped up during pre-season and taken the job so there was no doubt as to who was #1. That of course was a fail in every concievable way possible. Elliott's numbers in the exhibition season were 3 games played, with a 1-1-1 record, a 3.24 GAA and a pathetic .882 save % against inferior competition. Not to be outdone, Pascal Leclaire was worse. Also in 3 games, he was 1-2, with a 4.43 GAA, with a .856 save %, with his lone win coming in game in which he let in all 5 completely stoppable goals in an 8-5 victory against the Rangers last Saturday.
It was so bad that I was starting to envy the Habs fans with the Carey Price situation. No seriously I was.
So who do we go with? The only saving grace is that both of them are playing for a new contract this season, if not their careers. Pascal Leclaire is in the last year of a 3 year deal that paid him 3.8 million per season. If he wants a new deal anywhere near that, he will have to turn into an elite goalie this year and be very consistent. Otherwise, he will have to settle for a backup job next season, or perhaps even an invite to camp on a tryout basis. He doesn't have a good enough proven track record to demand that kind of money on his past play. If he doesn't kill it this year, kiss the millions goodbye. Brian Elliott is an RFA after this season, and needs to prove he can be an NHL goalie or the Sens may let him walk in the offseason.
One thing is for sure, only one or perhaps neither will be back next season, with blue chip 19 year old prospect Robin Lehner breathing down both of their necks. If we're talking full disclosure, Lehner was by far the best goalie through camp and the pre-season, and is only in Binghamton because of his age and lack of experience, not because of his play on the ice.
I do not envy Clouston's decision at all, kind of a damned if you do and damned if you do type scenario unfolding for him. So who is the lesser of the goalies?
In my opinion, both are very prone to soft, deflating goals that can kill your momentum. Elliott is very streaky and can put together weeks of solid play, as we witnessed last year with the 11 game win streak for example, but for whatever reason, seems to shrink in more important games, and just doesn't seem to have the pedigree to be a true #1 in the NHL. Leclaire on the other hand is clearly unlucky, frequently out of position, also prone to a softy or two, but does seem to have the ability to steal a game when it really counts, like last years playoffs. He also does have the pedigree of being a very high draft pick and being a star junior player, unlike Elliott who was picked dead last in the draft, not that it really matters in the scheme of things present day.
In the end, both will leave me with mulitple heart attacks this season, and will never give me the feeling of security that Hasek did for that one magical half season 5 years ago, which now seems like a century ago. How it it even possible that in 18 years, we've never had a decent goalie? We should have had one on sheer luck alone by now.
If I had to pick, I'd relunctantly go with Leclaire. We already know what Elliott is, a very good backup with the potential to be a #1 for short periods of time. Leclaire has the possibility in theory to be a bonafide #1 in the NHL, but if he can he actually produce that remains a massive question mark that looms over our season like Bruce Garrioch looms over a buffet.
We will all know the decision Clouston has made very soon. Either way he goes, there will be people questioning him, and maybe Murray will take some heat for not improving our situation as well. If we're lucky, we might even get a taste of Lehner before the season is over, but for now, we must deal with what we have, two guys who are playing for their livelyhood, which is never a bad thing.
Thoughts? Who do you think should be our #1 come opening night and why?